The Impact of Less Than Lethal Weapons in Law Enforcement

News | Back to all news

Sept. 9, 2024 | by: Solaren Risk Management

Let’s Discover the Impact of Less Than Lethal Weapons in Law Enforcement

Law enforcement in the U.S. began in the mid-19th century, with New York and Boston leading the way, as they were the most populated and developed cities at the time. Initially, police officers were issued batons, which are considered “less-than-lethal” weapons. Firearms didn’t become standard issue until later in the century, as officers needed to confront increasingly well-armed criminals. Today, advancements in technology have expanded the range of less-than-lethal options, but first, let’s clarify what that term means.

What is a less-than-lethal weapon defined as?

• A less-lethal weapon is defined as: a “device designed or converted to expel or propel less-lethal ammunition by any action, mechanism, or process, with the purpose of incapacitating, immobilizing, or stunning a human being by causing a less-than-lethal impairment of physical condition, function, or senses, including physical pain or discomfort.

Examples include beanbag rounds or rubberized projectiles” (2019, FBI). These weapons are intended to incapacitate individuals without the risk of causing severe injury or death.

Technological advancements have introduced new options

Technological advancements have introduced new options, such as chemical agents like pepper spray and conducted energy weapons (CEWs) such as Tasers. These tools are used by over 11,000 American law enforcement agencies to reduce the risk of serious injury. A study conducted by Professor Geoffrey Alpert of the University of South Carolina, funded by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), examined over 24,000 use-of-force incidents across 12 major law enforcement agencies. The study found that the use of physical force increased the risk of injury, while less-lethal weapons reduced that risk by up to 70% (Bulman).

Minimizing the risk of severe injury

At Solaren Risk Management, we require all armed security officers to carry a minimum of two less-lethal weapons while on duty to minimize the risk of severe injury. Our goal is to protect the community, not harm it. Our training in the use of these tools is comprehensive, led by experienced active and retired law enforcement personnel. This ensures our team is fully prepared to handle any situation, prioritizing the safety of both our clients and the public.

If you’re interested in less-lethal weapons training or want more information about our other offerings,

…please contact our training team at [email protected]. At Solaren, we are safety aware because we care!

“We are safety aware because we care”

1. (2019, April 26). Leoka definitions. FBI. https://ucr.fbi.gov/leoka/2019/resource-pages/definitions.
2. Bulman, P. (n.d.). Police use of force: The impact of less-lethal weapons and tactics. National Institute of Justice. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/police-use-force-impact-less-lethal-weapons-and-tactics.